Life Unconstructed
Archived Posts from this Category
28 July, 2013
Animated Short: PostHuman
Posted by blackcampbell under Movies, Science Fiction | Tags: anime short, cyberpunk, posthuman |Leave a Comment
24 July, 2013
Trailer: Gravity
Posted by blackcampbell under Movies, Science Fiction | Tags: Alfonso Cuarón, george clooney, gravity, sandra bullock |Leave a Comment
17 July, 2013
Review: Hannibal (The Series)
Posted by blackcampbell under Television | Tags: hannibal, hannibal lector, hugh dancy, mads mikkelsen, red dragon |Leave a Comment
I stumbled onto the series Hannibal — based on the characters of Red Dragon by Thomas Harris — on the NBC app on my iPad a few weeks ago, and as of last night, finished the first season. Right to the point: I was surprised, especially as I had thought the idea of another series killer catching killers -type show was unnecessary, at how good it was.
The great: Mad Mikkelsen is superb in the role. He’s far better than Anthomy Hopkins was; there’s none of the sloberng, creepy pervert quality that dominated his Lector in Silence of the Lambs. He’s better than Brian Cox, who was very good in the role in the original Manhunter. This Lector is precisely what I see when I read the book years ago: erudite, pleasant, an aesthete who protects himself from the world around him through a wall of beauty. Even his killings are directed at creating beauteous meals. He comes off as sympathetic, caring, and if very restrained. Until you see him in action. Mikkelsen plays him extremely low key, almost mask-like. Almost everything is done through the use of microexpressions.
The look and sound of the show is much more tight and atmospheric than is usual for broadcast television (this is airing on NBC!?!) Ambient noises are used in lieu of music in many scenes to create tension. They’ve also cut the number of episodes from the ludicrous 22/season of usual broadcast TV to the more reasonable 13 of an extended series on British television, or American cable shows like those on F/X. There’s almost no chaff in the wheat.
The good: The rest of the cast is solid, with Hugh Dancy doing a very nice rendition of Will Graham. His version is much more unstable and twitchy than the previous portrayals. Rather than just having the ability to empathize with the people he’s hunting, his imagination and empathy are so overpowering, that they make the character increasingly unstable. That and a healthy dose of encephalitis he has contracted sometime in the show. An honorable mentions to Raul Esparza as Dr. Chilton. He manages to capture all of the sleazy ick-factor Anthony Heald brought to the man in the movies, but he does much better at giving us the defensive, not so smart as he thinks quality. It’s a great performance. Another for Scott Thompson from Kids in the Hall fame. I haven’t seen him in much since his early comedic work, but he’s good as the acerbic pathologist.
And then there’s Freddie Lounds. The annoying reporter who I think was perfectly played by Phillip Seymour Hoffman, is replaced with redheaded and very fetching Canadian actress Lara Jean Chorostecki. To be fair — she’s great in the role, and the character is supremely manipulative, smart, and a great foil. But I hate that this character hasn’t been brutally murdered…which is a testament to Chorostecki’s acting that I want her character dead so much.
The bad: The weak link is Lawrence Fishburn’s Jack Crawford, who is presented with much less humanity than he has had in previous iterations. This has been a trend I’ve noticed in the actor’s work toward…well, gigantic douchebags that present their authority by being manipulative, aggressive, and unsympathetic. As the character that is the stand-in for moral authority, he’s badly outgunned by Mikkelsen’s amoral intellectual for your affections. (But his real life wife, Gina Torres (Zoe from Firefly), makes a great couple of cameos as his wife, dying of cancer. It’s the only time the character is sympathetic at all.)
The (possibly) bad: For some, the level of graphic violence might be a touch much…especially on network TV. Often you see the gory aftermath, occasionally relived through Graham’s reconstructions of the crime scenes. It’s necessary to the plots and to the nature of the material, but I found some of the scenes very intense, and I’m usually pretty tough on seeing stuff like this.
The rest: The show wanders off of the history established in Red Dragon (the only book Will Graham specifically shows up in.) The basics are there on his character, but some of the things he does in the book are transposed onto other characters. Another agent realizes Hannibal is the Chesapeake Ripper when she sees the drawing that tips Graham off in the book (and is killed.) The Minnesota Shrike is happening concurrently with the Ripper murders. Hannibal becomes an unofficial psychiatrist to Graham because Crawford wants to keep the increasingly unstable agent in the field. I won’t spoil the season end, but it takes us way off the path of the book and gives the show its own mythos and the freedom to pursue it.
Style: 5 out of 5. Substance: 5 out of 5. It’s a definite “buy” if you like the character of Lector, or this sort of suspense/horror/drama.
14 July, 2013
Blade Runner in 60 Seconds
Posted by blackcampbell under Movies | Tags: blade runner |Leave a Comment
1 July, 2013
Quick Review: Star Trek: Into Darkness
Posted by blackcampbell under Movies, Science Fiction | Tags: star trek: into darkness |Leave a Comment
I wanted to like this movie. I even enjoyed it while I was watching it, but as soon as the credits rolled, I knew it was that ephemeral enjoyment that comes from having enough stuff thrown at you that you don’t stop to notice the gigantic plot holes nor the lack of character development.
The cast is still good — those that get to do much — that being Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, and Simon Pegg. Even Benedict Cumberbatch, who I could not stand in Sherlock, but was good in the role, doesn’t really get that much to do but sound awesomely menacing and look pissed off. By now, Trekkies know John Harrison is Khan…and the attempt to use this quintessential villain to redefine the series was an awful, awful mistake on the part of the writers and JJ Abrams. The constant comparisons to the far-superior The Wrath of Khan do Into Darkness no favors. It just serves to show how shallow the characters have become under the writing of Orci, Kurtzman, and the execrable Damon Lindelof — whose influence destroyed the excellent Jon Spaihts Prometheus script. They’ve replaced a sense of friendship and respect between the various characters for one-liners and the occasion moment of faux pathos, like Scotty’s resigning his commission as engineer over the disagreement with Kirk.
Worse, there’s no real history between Khan and Kirk, as there was in TWOK. Khan is driven by twenty years of exile, the death of his wife and people to pursue Kirk relentlessly, to the exclusion of his own survival. Here’s Khan earns Kirk’s animosity because he kills Admiral Pike (again, the most engaging of the characters from this movie series…) early in the movie, but there’s no reason for him to hate Kirk specifically, nor fo him to pursue vengeance once he has (he presumes) what he wants. Additionally, the plot twist that ties into the later point is telegraphed far too early, and the “true” villain of the piece was obvious from about 10 minutes after his introduction.
There’s the usual collection of issue I’ve come to expect from Star Trek movies and shows since First Contact…forced humor, the terrifying and unstoppable bad guys who can get mowed down by a 10 year old with a squirt gun, overly ornate set pieces that make for silly action sequences. Add to that the new movie series’ “20 seconds to [enter planet]” warp travel that removes any sense of distance or grandeur from the universe. At one point, Kirk enthuses “A five year mission! That’s deep space!” Where the hell are they going, MACS0647-JD? At the kind of speeds Enterprise is traveling in the new movies, they could cross the galaxy in five year or so. (Yes, they always traveled at the speed of plot, but come on!)
The special effects are good, and the movie looks fantastic. They even toned down the lens flare, so you could see what the hell was going on.
In short, the movie was an excuse for a couple of decent action sequences and the Enterprise/Vengeance crash at the end of the film.
So what did I think? Style: 4 of 5 — the movies look good, and I’ve even softened to the Apple Store bridge. Substance: 1 out of 5. It’s sound and fury, signifying nothing. It’s a matinee, if you want to see the special effects in all their glory, otherwise, wait for the DVD (don’t pop for the Blu-Ray.)
Or you could pop The Wrath of Khan in and see how a real writer and director (Nicolas Mayer) work.
30 June, 2013
Quick Review: Europa Report
Posted by blackcampbell under Movies | Tags: europa report |[2] Comments
I noticed iTunes has Europa Report in it’s “See it before it’s in theaters” section, so the wife and I decided to attempt a movie night. I’d been looking forward to this movie since it popped up on my radar about six months ago.
The basic premise is nothing new: first manned mission to [enter place] goes awry due to technical, personal, or external forces and the crew must strive to survive and/or complete their mission. We’ve seen this from Destination Moon through 2001, to Apollo 13 or the double whammy of Red Planet / Mission to Mars. Most of the bad reviews for the film to stem from this complaint of the film being “predictable.” Additionally, we’ve seen plenty of “found footage” movies like the Blair Witch Project, Cloverfield, etc.– a category which this also falls into.
To avoid spoilers, I’m going to be vague on the basic plot elements. You know one of the crew will die early on in a technical problem, ala Frank Poole in 2001. You know they find something on Europa and things go badly. This is all teased early, and the movie steadily puts the pieces together for you, but does so non-temporally. This is to my mind, the biggest downside to the movie. It’s overly artsy and can confuse the viewer, if they aren’t paying close attention. The use of quick cuts between the cameras around the ship is supposed to give us a feeling of “being there”, but I found it distracting. The out of sequence storytelling tightens as they get closer to Europa, but it can pull you out of the movie early on. If you stick with it, they get better about telling the story in a more linear fashion.
The movie advertises its attempt to be more hard science than most science fiction films. The style of photography is very evocative of the remote cameras that NASA and ESA plaster all over their vehicles for the news. It looks good; it looks right. They use centrifugal gravitation, not “magic” artificial gravity; the sets are very claustrophobic and have exposed piping and conduits — it looks very much like a cleaned up International Space Station — and the commentary on the dull, lonely, and uninspiring living conditions also enhances verisimilitude. There is no sound in space, save for a few spots I caught them doing it to heighten the atmosphere, but it’s subtle. The music by Bear McCreary is spare and effective.
The actors — mostly unknowns to the American audience, save Sharlto Copley from District 9 and Michael Nyquist from the original The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo — are good in their respective roles and they capture the tightly-controlled personalities of astronauts. There’s none of the Kubrickian dehumanized robots of 2001, but they also don’t lose their crap when bad things start happening. Honorable mention for having Isiah Whitlock, Jr. — the guy that played Clay Davis in The Wire as one of the misson’s leadership, although I kept waiting for the trademark Davis “shhiiiiiiiiiiit” to come out of his mouth.
The Europa portions of the movie are ore straightforward and move quickly, although this is where the film changes gears from artsy sci-fi movie to more straightforward thriller/horror movie. The final reveal might leave audience members a bit underwhelmed after the journey, but for those who want a science fiction movie that at least makes the attempt to be more than the latest bug hunt or action movie that happens to be in space, you might like it.
So how was it? For style, I’m split — the look and sound of the movie is great, but the out of sequence storytelling and quick cut nonsense bring it from a 5 to a 3 of five. For substance, I’d give it a 4 out of 5, although I could see where some might want to give it less. Or in my terms — it’s definitely worth a matinee or a DVD/download buy, but I don’t know i would have felt I got my money’s worth full price.
Which is more than I can say for Star Trek: Into Darkness.
2 June, 2013
A Look at Heath Ledger’s Joker Notebook
Posted by blackcampbell under Comic Books, Movies | Tags: batman, heath ledger, the dark knight, the joker |Leave a Comment
7 May, 2013
Trailer: Ender’s Game
Posted by blackcampbell under Movies, Science Fiction | Tags: ender's game, trailer |Leave a Comment
I’ve not read the book, but it has a spectacularly large fan base, so…
17 April, 2013
The Day Is Here: Vote Black Campbell For RPG Site of the Year
Posted by blackcampbell under Life Unconstructed | Tags: 2013 rpg soty, battlestar galactica rpg, gamemaster tips, james bond rpg |Leave a Comment
Voting is open over on Stuffer Shack for the 2013 RPG site of the year. So, if you’ve enjoyed the site, gotten good use out of the game-specific materials, or just wants to be a mensch…go over and vote for us!