Mark Meredith has an excellent fan site for the new MHR game here. There’s datafiles for heroes and villains, modular gear profiles and milestones for groups. It’s a must-stop for Marvel players.
14 May, 2012
Quick Review: The Avengers
Posted by blackcampbell under Movies | Tags: joss whedon, the avengers |[4] Comments
I had high hopes for this one, but due to the quality of the latest Marvel Studios product, and the strengths of Joss Whedon (Firefly, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along-Blog) — I was not disappointed. The Avengers is a great popcorn movie and if not the best of the Marvel outings, it places.
The great bits of the movie are no surprise to Whedon fans: the dialogue and character interaction is superb, and occasionally subtle enough to miss. (Tony Stark, while still being snarky, manages to show a deep respect for Bruce Banner throughout the movie; something he doesn’t do with the other characters until the end.) The characters are well-written, from Black Widow’s ability to coax information out of the arrogant Loki, to Captain America’s spot-on “There’s only one God, ma’am, and he doesn’t dress like that…” line, to Tony Stark’s unwillingness to reign himself in to work with the others until the final battle. Of particular note is the SHIELD agent, Phil Coulson, who has a delightful moment where he’s trying to get Captain American to sign his Cap trading cards. (“They’re vintage!”) All the actors turn in solid performances, but Downey and Ruffalo really shine in this picture. Thor should be a bit more central with the villain being Loki, but he’s underutilized (as is Loki, really…) I got the impression that Whedon simply wasn’t interested in the characters that much.
The good: Whedon also managed to couple the story and characters to the CGI effects well: the SHIELD helicarrier is spectacularly rendered. The Hulk looks great and they manage to pull character out of the computer generated monstrosity in a way the other two movies couldn’t touch.
The bad: Well, there is Whedon’s usual killing off of the most likable support character. He does this in everything he’s put out, from Penny in Dr. Horrible, to Wash and Book in Serenity, and on and on in Angel, Dollhouse, and Buffy. You know it’s coming…it’s still annoying precisely because it’s not that much of a surprise, anymore.
But honestly, for me the worst part of The Avengers has got to be Samuel L Jackson as Nick Fury. He’s phoning the performance in. When he should be pissed, he comes off as mildly offended or peeved. He does almost nothing in the movie but jerk the heroes around to get them into action. His big moment in the sun is when he shoots down his own pilot from launching a nuke at Manhattan on the orders of the Committee — and still doesn’t stop the launch. His new sidekick (Cobie Smulders) is more interesting — and she even milks a bit of character out of a Hallmark card-flat bit player. (Her facial expressions when dealing with Captain America [sly sexual tension] and Tony Stark [ill-repressed revulsion] make her more than just admittedly-attractive furniture in the helicarrier.)
By the end of the movie, it’s obvious that Fury should be commanding a radar installation in Alaska, and Coulson or Hawkeye should be running SHIELD.
Loki was uninspired as a villain, and his attempt to break the cohesion of the team seemed overly convoluted and designed to pad the almost-too-long run time. The final battle is a bit confused and too long, as well, and we never really get much background on the inter-dimensional bad guys that Loki has teamed up with. (I’m presuming if you’ve read The Avengers comic, you’ll have a better grasp of who and what these guys are.)
Overall, it’s a four of five, for me — solidly good, almost great, but it didn’t quite have that ability to make me feel a sense of delight that Captain America or X-Men: First Class did. A few more minutes trimmed in the editing room and a bit more work on making Thor and Loki more important to the plot, would have made this the best of the Marvel flicks.
10 May, 2012
Orangutans in the Miami Zoo are learning to communicate with iPads, using apps developed for aiding autistic people. As usual, the older apes think the technology is unnatural and corrupting the ape youth of America, but that’s just ’cause they’re squares, daddy-o.
The one thing I learned in the story that was interesting is that this species has no voice box and cannot produce much in the way of sounds.
4 May, 2012
On a lark I bought Haywire from iTunes last night. It’s an action movie by Steven Soderberg (usually good stuff) and stars MMA fighter Gina Carano, Ewan McGregor, and Michael Fassbender. To my surprise, I didn’t get the movie I thought I’d get, but an a rather decent espionage/action pic.
The good: the movie isn’t overly convoluted, like a lot of spy pics like to get with triple and quadruple twists; the intelligence field is often stunningly simple — the motivations are money, feeling unappreciated or undervalued, or there’s an ideological component. Know the motivations, anticipate the actions, then take the blame when policymakers screw up the big moves. Haywire keeps is simple. The bad guys are quickly established, their motives are a bit shady, but once understood, the plot is — as in life — a “why didn’t I see that coming?” moment.
The fight sequences, as you would expect, are quite good and very vicious. they have a reality that most fight coordination lacks. Soderberg also understands that it’s better to see what’s happening, rather than obscuring it in fast cuts to make the action faster. You can see what the participants are doing and it looks painful. Easily the most brutal feeling is the first encounter with Channing Tatum, an actor you might not know the name of, but you’ll recognize straight off.
I like that Soderberg kept her character, Mallory Kane, more realistic. She gets knocked around a lot, and while her character keeps fighting, she doesn’t have the superman feel the action pics give to some characters. She gets bruised and cut, and stays that way; she gets hurt and doesn’t shrug it off. It has a similar feel to the fights in Casino Royale.
Soderberg looks to be using natural lighting through the movie, and it gives the film a more realistic feel than the artfully lit action movies. The music is quirky and has an almost 60/early 70s feel to it that lends a big more class to the picture. Top it off with excellent performances from Fassbender (rapidly becoming one of my favorite actors), McGregor (always reliable, even when the movie sucks), and a very understated, classy turn by Antonio Banderas. I’m not overly impressed with Tatum as an actor, but he slams down the action work like a champ. Michael Douglas is a bit player in the movie playing every other Michael Douglas in a suit role.
The bad: the timing of the film and the way the trailers were put together made this feel like it would be a “Bourne with tits” show. It is and it isn’t. You know the heroine got set up (not by the government, but by her company, run by her sleezy spec ops contractor boyfriend [McGregor.]) The film tells the why in flashbacks and I found I wanted a bit more reveal over the course of the movie, rather than the confession/info dump from McGregor at the end. I thought Douglas’ role needed expanded and better integrated into the film; that could have been an editing room issue.
I’m splitting this bit specifically to talk about Gina Carano. She looks like someone that knows how to throw a punch and isn’t glammed up, and she is beautifully physical in the role. She doesn’t get a lot of time for acting — probably a good thing for her first movie — and there’s a lot of glaring and looking superior. I don’t fault her; the director could have worked in a few moments to really humanize her with a few small gestures. I’m not saying she can’t act, but I don’t think she was pushed as hard to do so as she was to show off her remarkable athleticism. I didn’t expect this, as I was supremely unimpressed by the trailers, but I’d like to see her in something again where they give her a bit more than just muy thai to do.
Overall, I’d give this a three and a half to four out of five, depending on your expectations of the movie. If you want kick ass fights and a spare but good story, four; if you wanted a deep spy thriller or a more Bourne-like frenetic ride, 3.5. Or for those that know me: it was a good matinee movie, but not a full pricer. So if you rent, well worth it; if you and a bunch of buddies are going to watch it at least once, it’s a good buy from iTunes or on DVD.
3 May, 2012
30 April, 2012
David Brin on Libertarianism, Government, and Transhumanism
Posted by blackcampbell under News and Politics, Science | Tags: david brin, libertarianism, uplift series |Leave a Comment


